Christianity and the State

Authors

  • Alexander LIKHOSHERSTOV He s been occupying a position of an academic dean of Dniepropetrovsk Bible Cooldge, Ukraine

Keywords:

Christianity and the State, church-state relationships,

Abstract

The issue of the relationship between church and state has had a long and complex history. During the last two thousand years, many models of church-state relationships have been devised and put into practice in the political structures of different states. It should be noted that the possibility of the church’s involvement in secular politics in Russia and Ukraine makes the need for theological conceptualisation in this field especially urgent. The article presents a holistic and comprehensive approach to the theological discussion of the church-state relationship that will certainly be of interest to many contemporary researchers, examining the unique experience of theocracy in Judaism; the historical formation of the idea of Caesaropapism in both pagan and Christian states; and the theological controversy between the monarchical and Berdyaev schools on the issue of close alliance between church and state

Author Biography

Alexander LIKHOSHERSTOV, He s been occupying a position of an academic dean of Dniepropetrovsk Bible Cooldge

Born in 1974. Graduated from Suvorov Military School getting the certificate with merit (a golden medal) in 1992. Four years later graduated from the University of Internal Affairs, juridical faculty. From 1998 till 2001 he was working in the position of an editor-in-chief of the Good News journal. He is an author of many publications. He s given a Master of Arts in Practical Ministry (Bible Institute TCM, Vienna, Austria). He s been occupying a position of an academic dean of Dniepropetrovsk Bible Cooldge  Light of the Gospel  since 2001. In 2003 he finished his studies on M.Div. program and at present he is preparing the materials for writing a doctoral thesis.

References

  1. CICERO, DIALOGUES ON STATE, ABOUT LEGISLATION, M., 1994, P. 9-10.
  2. ALEKSEYEV N.N, CHRISTIANITY AND MONARCHY IDEA // PUT, PARIS, 1927, № 6. PP. 20-21.
  3. BAILLET J, LE REGIME PHARAONIQUE, PARIS, T I, 1912, P.10.
  4. BAILLET J, LE REGIME PHARAONIQUE, PARIS, T.I, 1912, P.233.
  5. JEREMIAS A, HANDBUCH DER ALTORIENTALISHEN GEISTESKULTUR, 1913, P. 168-177.
  6. NIKOLIN A, CHURCH AND STATE, EDITION OF SREITIN CLOISTER, 1997, P.13.
  7. ACT OF OECUMENICAL COUNCILS, C. IV, ST-PET, 1996, P.328.
  8. LISTL JOSEF, STATE AND CHURCH IN WEST CHURCH LATIN TRADITION OF CHRISTIANITY, BONN, 1999, P.3.
  9. BOLOTOV V.V., LECTIONS ON ANCIENT CHURCH HISTORY, VOL. 3, REPRINT ED. M, 1994, P.51.
  10. NIKOLAYEV S., THE DISSCONVOYED. // POSEV, № 9, 1997, P.34.
  11. NERSESYANTZ V.S., HISTORY OF POLITICAL AND LEGAL DOCTRINES, M., 1999, PP. 102-105.
  12. NERSESYANTZ V.S., HISTORY OF POLITICAL AND LEGAL DOCTRINES, M., 1999, PP.113-115.
  13. ALISTER MAGRAT. THEOLOGICAL IDEA OF REFORMATION, ODESSA, 1994, PP.251-252.
  14. ALISTER MAGRAT. THEOLOGICAL IDEA OF REFORMATION, ODESSA, 1994, PP.252-253.
  15. GRISAR, LUTHER, PARIS, 1924, VOL.1, P.421.
  16. ALISTER MAGRAT. THEOLOGICAL IDEA OF REFORMATION, ODESSA, 1994, PP. 262-263.
  17. N.N ALEKSEYEV, IDEA OF “MUNTANE TOWN” IN CHRISTIAN DOGMA // PUT, PARIS, 1926, № 5. P. 19.
  18. LOPUKHIN A.P., LEGISLATION OF MOSES, ST-PET., 1882, P.233.
  19. DYAKONOV I., POWER OF MOSCOW CZARS, LITOGRAPH. ED., M., 1915. PP.157-163.
  20. DYAKONOV I., POWER OF MOSCOW CZARS, LITOGRAPH. ED., M., 1915. PP. 177-181.
  21. USTRYALOV N., LEGENDS OF PRINCE KURBSKIY, SECOND EDITION, 1842, P.156.
  22. USTRYALOV N., LEGENDS OF PRINCE KURBSKIY, SECOND EDITION, 1842, P.157.
  23. TIKHOMIROV L.A., PERSONAL AUTHORITY AS STATE ORGANIZATION PRINCIPLE, 1897, MOSCOW. P. 56.
  24. TIKHOMIROV L.A., PERSONAL AUTHORITY AS STATE ORGANIZATION PRINCIPLE, 1897, MOSCOW. P. 48.
  25. NIKOLIN A., CHURCH AND STATE, EDITION OF SREITIN CLOISTER, 1997. P.208.
  26. KARTASHEV A.V., STUDIES ON HISTORY OF RUSSIAN CHURCH, VOL.2,. M., 1991, P.322.
  27. TALBERG N. HISTORY OF RUSSIAN CHURCH, VOL.2, JORDANVILLE, 1959, P.532-533.
  28. PAVLOV A.S., COURSE OF CHURCH LAW, M., 1892, P. 506-508.
  29. FLOROVSKIY G. PATHS OF RUSSIAN GOD-THINKING, VILNIUS, 1991, P. 89.
  30. BRYANCHANINOV I., SACRAMENTS OF SOLE, HOLY, CATHEDRAL AND APOSTOLIC CHURCH, ST-PET., 1863, PP.24-25.
  31. PETROV A., LETTER OF MONARCHIST TO THE EDITORS OF “PUT” JOURNAL // PUT, PARIS, 1926, № 3. P. 105.
  32. TRUBETSKOY G., DISPUTE ON MONARCHY // // PUT, PARIS, 1926, № 4. P. 134.
  33. BERDYAEV N.A., ANSWER TO MONARCHIST’S LETTER // PUT, PARIS, 1926, № 3. P. 109-110.
  34. This letter being unique by its content was published for the first time in “Nachala” journal, 1921, Citation according to Speranskiy V., A quarter of a century ago (In memory of Vladimir Solovyev) // Put, Paris, 1926, № 2. p. 81-82.
  35. BERDYAEV N.A., ANSWER TO MONARCHIST’S LETTER // PUT, PARIS, 1926, № 3. P. 108.
  36. ACTS OF APOSTOLIC PATRIARCHY TIKHON AND THE POSTERIOR DOCUMENTS ON SUCCESSION OF HIGHEST CHURCH AUTHORITY 1917-1943, M., 1994, P. 287.
  37. ALL-UKRAINIAN ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIANS, COMPENDIUM OF DOCUMENTS, P. II, KIEV, 2002, P.5.
  38. BERDYAEV N.A., NIGHTMARE OF EVIL GOOD // PUT., PARIS, 1926, № 4, P.82-83.
  39. TRUBETSKOY E.N., SELECTED WORKS, M., 1994, P. 257-258.

Downloads

How to Cite

LIKHOSHERSTOV, Alexander. 2016. “Christianity and the State”. Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology, no. 2 (June):201-18. http://reflections.eeit-edu.info/article/view/88849.