Scattered, Oppressed, Empowered: Resemanticization of Χρῖσμα in 1 John 2:20

Authors

  • Yevgeny Ustinovich Evangelical Theological Faculty, Belgium

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29357/2789-1577.2025.23.2.2

Keywords:

resemanticization, metonymy, anointing, antichrists, Epistles of John

Abstract

This article focuses on arguably the central element of a Christian’s identity as it is seen in John’s letters (and the rest of Johannine corpus—the Fourth Gospel and Revelation). While there are many ways of describing this Christ-centred reality (new birth, adoption, election, baptism, etc.), here an attempt is made to show how characteristically Johannine use of the noun χρῖσμα (and some OT precedents of resemanticization) can help the reader identify with Christ himself and with scattered, uprooted Christian communities. The main argument is that this identification is primarily metonymical (based on unity of purpose/mission), rather than metaphorical (based on the perceived similarity of circumstances). John’s χρῖσμα is an essential element of the disciples’ view of themselves as a community of “sent ones.” Such identification may help marginalized and disoriented migrants see their experience of being scattered and displaced against a possible background of God’s larger purpose in the world.

In his approach, John seems to be following several OT trajectories of the semantic shift. As the word χριστός in LXX was given sematic extensions, so that it included individuals who originally did not seem to possess the necessary status, so in John’s Epistles χρῖσμα, taken far beyond its literal meaning, serves as a group marker. Those whom John identifies as recipients of χρῖσμα are viewed as individuals strongly rooted both in the past and—eschatologically—in the future.

References

  1. Bauckham, Richard. The Audience of the Fourth Gospel.” In Jesus in the Johannine Tradition. Eds. R.T. Fortna and T. Thatcher, 101–111. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.
  2. Cirafesi, Wally V. “The Johannine Community Hypothesis (1968–Present): Past and Present Approaches and a New Way Forward.” Currents in Biblical Research 12, no. 2 (2014): 173–93.
  3. Declaissé-Walford, Nancy; Rolf A. Jacobson; Beth Laneel Tanner. The Book of Psalms. The New International Commentary on the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2014.
  4. Goldingay, John. Psalms. V. 3. Psalms 90–150. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008.
  5. Klink, Edward W. III. The Sheep of the Fold: The Audience and Origin of the Gospel of John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  6. Koester, Craig R. “The Spectrum of Johaninne Readers.” In "What Is John?” Volume 1: Readers and Reading of the Fourth Gospel, edited by Fernando F. Segovia, 5–19. SBL Symposium Series 3. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1996.
  7. Köstenberger, Andreas J. A Theology of John’s Gospel and Letters. Grand Rapids, MI: 2009.
  8. Kruse, Colin G. The Letters of John. 2nd ed. The Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2020.
  9. Lamb, David A. Text, Context and the Johannine Community: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of the Johannine Writings. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2014.
  10. Leithart, Peter J. The Epistles of John Through New Eyes: From Behind the Veil. Monroe, LA: Athanasius Press, 2009.
  11. Lieu, Judith M. I, II, III John: A Commentary. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2008.
  12. Parsenios, George L. First, Second, and Third John. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2014.
  13. Selman, Martin J. “Messianic Mysteries” in: The Lord’s Anointed: Interpretation of Old Testament Messianic Texts. Eds. Philip E. Satterthwaite, Richard S. Hess, and Gordon J. Wenham, 281–302. Carlisle, Cumbria: The Paternoster Press, 1995.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-18

How to Cite

Ustinovich, Yevgeny. 2025. “Scattered, Oppressed, Empowered: Resemanticization of Χρῖσμα in 1 John 2:20”. Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology 23 (2):30-44. https://doi.org/10.29357/2789-1577.2025.23.2.2.