Secularisation as the Fragmentation of the Sacred and of Sacred Space

Authors

  • Marietta van der Tol Blavatnik School of Government,University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Philip Gorski Yale University, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29357/2789-1577.2024.22.1.1

Keywords:

secularisation, sacred, public space, time

Abstract

Contemporary conflicts about secularity in ‘the West’ tend to focus on public space. Although collective Christian heritage means that public space is rarely exclusively neutral, conflicts continue to arise over the relationship between secularity and religious symbolism, and especially over those symbols which derive from religious minorities. This contribution critically considers the designation of space as either sacred or secular in political imaginaries, approaching processes of secularisation as part of a fragmentation of the sacred and of sacred space. We introduce the concept of trans-liminal space: spaces which can contain multiple and potentially conflicting ascriptions of meaning. Conceptualizing public space as trans-liminal allows for contemporaneous and competing ascriptions of the secular, the sacred, the secular-sacred, and the sacred-secular, without being exclusively grounded in either. Trans-liminality does not preclude public space to be predominantly secular, but it does problematise the phenomenon of normative exclusions of religious symbols from public spaces.

References

  1. Albanese, C. L. 2007. A Republic of Mind and Spirit: A Cultural History of American Metaphysical Religion. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  2. Asad, T. 2003. Formations of the Secular. Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Online Book. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/yale/Doc?id=10042838
  3. Balkenhol, M., E. van den Hemel, and I. Stengs. 2020. “Introduction: Emotional Entanglements of Sacrality and Secularity—Engaging the Paradox.” In The Secular Sacred, edited by M. Balkenhol, E. van den Hemel, and I. Stengs, 1–18. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Barber, M. 2014. The Cathars: Dualist Heretics in Languedoc in the High Middle Ages. London: Routledge.
  5. Barr, B. A. 2021. The Making of Biblical Womanhood: How the Subjugation of Women Became Gospel Truth. Grand Rapids: Baker Books.
  6. Bejczy, I. 1997. “Tolerantia: A Medieval Concept.” Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (3): 365–384. doi:10.1353/jhi.1997.0024.
  7. Bell, D. A. 2014. “Reconciling Confucianism and Nationalism.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 41 (1–2): 33–54. doi:10.1111/1540-6253.12091.
  8. Berger, P. L. 1969. The Sacred Canopy; Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  9. Berger, P. L. 1999. “The Desecularization of the World: A Global Overview.” In The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics, edited by P. L. Berger, 1–18. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
  10. Berger, P. L., G. Davie, and E. Fokas. 2008. Religious America, Secular Europe?: A Theme and Variation. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
  11. Bowen, J. R. 2007. Why the French Don’t Like Headscarves : Islam, the State, and Public Space. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  12. Brubaker, R. 2012. “Religion and Nationalism: Four Approaches.” Nations and Nationalism 18 (1): 2–20. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8129.2011.00486.x.
  13. Brubaker, R. 2017. “Between Nationalism and Civilizationism: The European Populist Moment in Comparative Perspective.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 (8): 1191–1226. doi:10.1080/01419870.2017.1294700.
  14. Bruce, S. 2002. God is Dead : Secularization in the West. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers. Casanova, J. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago
  15. Press.
  16. Chaplin, J. 2021. “A Political Theology of ‘The People’: Enlisting Classical Concepts for Contemporary Critique.” In The Spirit of Populism, edited by U. Schmiedel and J. Ralston, 239–243. Leiden: Brill.
  17. Cremer, T. 2022. Defenders of the Faith? Religion, National Populism and the Rise of Right­Wing Identity Politics. London: Routledge.
  18. de La Ferrière, A. A. 2020. “Laïcité: le débat bat son plein.” Archives de sciences sociales des religions 192 (192): 53–58.
  19. Desan, S. 1990. Reclaiming the Sacred: Lay Religion and Popular Politics in Revolutionary France. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  20. D’Hollander, P. 2004. ”The Church in the Street in Nineteenth-Century France.” Translated by Carol E. Harrison. Journal of the Western Society for French History 32: 171–194.
  21. Dreher, R. 2018. The Benedict Option: A Strategy for Christians in a Post­Christian Nation. New York: Sentinel.
  22. Durkheim, E., and G. Simpson. 1964. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.
  23. Fabian, J. 1983. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. repr. New York: Columbia University Press.
  24. Frankel, J. 1992. “Assimilation and the Jews in Nineteenth-Century Europe: Towards a Newhistoriography?” In Assimilation and Community: The Jews in Nineteenth­Century Europe, edited by J. Frankel and S. J. Zipperstein, 1–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Gellner, E. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  26. Gorski, P. 2000. “The Mosaic Moment: An Early Modernist Critique of Modernist Theories of Nationalism.” The American Journal of Sociology 105 (5): 1428–1468. doi:10.1086/210435.
  27. Gorski, P. S. 2000. “Historicizing the Secularization Debate: Church, State, and Society in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europea, ca. 1300–1700.” American Sociological Review 65 (1): 138–167.
  28. Gorski, P., and S. Perry. 2022. The Flag and the Cross: White Christian Nationalism and the Threat to American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  29. Greenfeld, L. 1996. “Nationalism and Modernity.” Social Research: An International Quarterly 63 (2): 3–40.
  30. Hanegraaff, W. J. 1999. “New Age Spiritualities as Secular Religion: A Historian’s Perspective.” Social Compass 46 (2): 145.
  31. Hauerwas, S., and W. H. Willimon. 1989. Resident Aliens, Life in the Christian Colony: A Provocative Christian Assessment of Culture and Ministry for People Who Know That Something is Wrong. Nashville: Abingdon Press.
  32. Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and Time. Edited by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. New York: Harper.
  33. Heilman, R. B., E. Voegelin, and C. R. Embry. 2004. Robert B. Heilman and Eric Voegelin: A Friendship in Letters, 1944–1984. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
  34. Herbert, D. 2011. “Theorizing Religion and Media in Contemporary Societies: An Account of Religious ‘Publicization’.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 14 (6): 626–648. doi:10.1177/1367549411419981.
  35. Hjelm, T. 2014. “Understanding the New Visibility of Religion.” Journal of Religion in Europe 7 (3–4): 203–222. doi:10.1163/18748929-00704002.
  36. Jaffrelot, C. 2021. Modi’s India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  37. Jeldtoft, N., and J. S. Nielsen, eds. 2012. Methods and Contexts in the Study of Muslim Minorities: Visible and Invisible Muslims. New York: Routledge.
  38. Joas, H. 2021. The Power of the Sacred: An Alternative to the Narrative of Disenchantment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  39. Johnson, S. R. C. 2021. “‘We the People of Israel’: Covenant, Constitution, and the Supposed Biblical Origins of Modern Democratic Political Thought.” The Journal of the Bible and Its Reception 8 (2): 247–268.
  40. Josephson-Storm, J. A. 2017. The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  41. Kaplan, B. J. 2002. “Fictions of Privacy: House Chapels and the Spatial Accommodation of Religious Dissent in Early Modern Europe.” The American Historical Review 107 (4): 1031–1064. doi:10.1086/532663.
  42. Kaplan, S. 2005. “‘Religious Nationalism’: A Textbook Case from Turkey.” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 25 (3): 665–676.
  43. Kaplan, B. J. 2007. Divided by Faith: Religious Conflict and the Practice of Toleration in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  44. Khomyakov, M. 2013. “Toleration and Respect: Historical Instances and Current Problems.” European Journal of Political Theory 12 (3): 223–239. doi:10.1177/1474885112465247.
  45. Knoblauch, H. 2003. “Europe and Invisible Religion.” Social Compass 50 (3): 267–274. doi:10.1177/00377686030503001.
  46. Kohn, H. 1944. The Idea of Nationalism: A Study in Its Origins and Background. New York: McMillan Publishing Co.
  47. Koselleck, R. 1979. Vergangene Zukunft: Zur Semantik Geschichtlicher Zeiten [Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time]. Translated by K. Tribe. New York: Columbia University Press.
  48. Kripal, J. J. 2011. Mutants and Mystics: Science Fiction, Superhero Comics, and the Paranormal. Place: University of Chicago Press.
  49. Lopez, J. C. 2016. “Beyond Eurocentrism and Orientalism: Revisiting the Othering of Jews and Muslims Through Medieval Canon Law.” Review of International Studies 42 (3): 450–470. doi:10.1017/S0260210515000455.
  50. Löwith, K. 2011. Meaning in History: The Theological Implications of the Philosophy of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  51. Low, S., and N. Smith. 2005. The Politics of the Public Sphere. New York: Routledge. Luckmann, T. 1967. The Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society. New York: Macmillan.
  52. Luria, K. P. 2005. Sacred Boundaries: Religious Coexistence and Conflict in Early­Modern France. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.
  53. Madanipour, A. 2019. “Rethinking Public Space: Between Rhetoric and Reality.” Urban Design International 24 (1): 38–46.
  54. McLeod, H. 1990. “Secularisation and Revival in the 19th Century City.” Hispania Sacra 42 (86): 391.
  55. Moslener, S. 2015. Virgin Nation: Sexual Purity and American Adolescence. New York: Oxford University Press.
  56. Neuhaus, R. J. 1984. The Naked Public Square: Religion and Democracy in America. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co.
  57. O’Brien, C. C. 1988. Godland: Reflections on Religion and Nationalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  58. Parsons, T. 1971. The System of Modern Societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Rosa, H. 2019. Resonance: A Sociology of Our Relationship to the World. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  59. Shakman Hurd, E. 2004. “The Political Authority of Secularism in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 10 (2): 235–262. doi:10.1177/1354066104042936.
  60. Smith, A. D. 2003. Chosen Peoples: Sacred Sources of National Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  61. Sorkin, D. 2018. The Religious Enlightenment. Protestants, Jews and Catholics from London to Vienna. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  62. Strømmen, H., and U. Schmiedel. 2020. The Claim to Christianity: Responding to the Far Right. London: SCM Press.
  63. Tambiah, S. J. 1992. Buddhism Betrayed? : Religion, Politics, and Violence in Sri Lanka. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  64. Taylor, C. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  65. Te Brake, W. P. 2017. Religious War and Religious Peace in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  66. Terpstra, N. 2014. “Civic Religion.” In The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Christianity, edited by J. Arnold, 148–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  67. Thompson, E. P. 1964. The Making of the English Working Class. New York: Pantheon.
  68. Tschannen, O. 1991. “The Secularization Paradigm: A Systematization.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 30 (4): 395–415. doi:10.2307/1387276.
  69. Tschannen, O. 1992. Les théories de la sécularisation. Genève: Droz.
  70. Tutino, S. 2006. “Between Nicodemism and ‘Honest’ dissimulation: The Society of Jesus in England.” Historical Research 79 (206): 534–553.
  71. van der Tol, M. D. C. 2020. “Politics of Religious Diversity: Toleration, Religious Freedom and Visibility of Religion in Public Space.” PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
  72. van der Tol, M. D. C. 2021. “The ‘Jew’, the Nation and Assimilation: The Old Testament and the Fashioning of the ‘Other’ in German and Dutch Protestant Thought.” The Journal of the Bible and Its Reception 8 (2): 143–162.
  73. van der Tol, M. D. C., and M. P. Rowley. 2021. “A Posture of Protest? The Search for Christian Identity in a Post-Secular Society: Between Secularised Eschatology and Asacralisation of History.” International Journal of Religion 2 (2): 101–113.
  74. Voegelin, E. 1952. The New Science of Politics, An Introduction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  75. Walsham, A. 2006. Charitable Hatred: Tolerance and Intolerance in England, 1500–1700. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  76. Warner, R. S. 1993. “Work in Progress Toward a New Paradigm for the Sociological Study of Religion in the United States.” The American Journal of Sociology 98 (5): 1044–1093. doi:10.1086/230139.
  77. Weber, M. 1958. “Religious Rejections of the World and Their Directions.” In From Max Weber, edited by H. Gerth and C. W. Mills, 257–361. New York: Oxford University Press.
  78. Wilson, B. R. 1985. “Secularization: The Inherited Model.” In The Sacred in a Secular Age, edited by P. E. Hammond, 9–20. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  79. Wydra, H. 2015. Politics and the Sacred. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Yuval-Davis, N. 1997. Gender and Nation. London: Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-13

How to Cite

van der Tol, Marietta, and Philip Gorski. 2024. “Secularisation As the Fragmentation of the Sacred and of Sacred Space”. Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology 22 (1):11-34. https://doi.org/10.29357/2789-1577.2024.22.1.1.

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 1 (2024): Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Marietta van der Tol, Philip Gorski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

All articles published in the Journal are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

By submitting an article for publication in Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology the author grants the editors the right to publish the article and distribute it in electronic and print form.

The author reserves all copyrights and the right to use the materials of the article in whole or in part for educational purposes, to write his own dissertations, to prepare abstracts, conference reports, oral presentations, etc., as well as post electronic copies of articles (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal’s official website) on non-commercial web-resources without the consent of the editorial board and founders.