Prophetic Subjectivity in Later Levinas

Authors

  • Anna Yampolskaya Doctor of Sciences in History of Philosophy, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Centre for Fundamental Sociology, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29357/2789-1577.2021.19.2.50-69

Keywords:

Levinas, prophecy, kenosis, identity, Rosenzweig, Kafka

Abstract

This paper explores how Levinas redefines the traditional notion of prophecy shifting the emphasis from the content of prophecy to the figure of the prophet, thus making prophetic inspiration a key feature of ethical subjectivity. The principal aim of the paper is to analyse the resulting triangular structure involving God and the Other. This structure is inherently unstable because God is incessantly stepping back in kenotic withdrawal. I show how this fundamental instability is reflected in the structure of the phenomenalisation of God’s glory, the structure of obedience to God’s order, and the structure of the authorship of prophecy. The prophetic experience is marked by heterogeneity; it can never be completely appropriated. Responsibility for the Other brings the subject to light as a witness of the glory of the Infinite, but not as the subject of selfidentification.

This is the Russian translation of an article that was originally published in English: Yampolskaya, Anna. 2019. "Prophetic Subjectivity in Later Levinas: Sobering up from One’s Own Identity" Religions 10, no. 1: 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10010050

The article was translated by Anna Yampolskaya.

References

  1. Ajzenstat, Oona. Driven back to the text: the premodern sources of Levinas’ postmodernism. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 2001.
  2. Basterra, Gabriela. The Subject of Freedom: Kant, Levinas. NY: Fordham University Press, 2015.
  3. Ben-Bassat, Hedda. “Narrative Transformation of Philosophical Ethics: Grace Paley’s Dialogic Model and the ‘Prophetic Subject’ of Emmanuel Levinas.” The Yearbook of Research in English and American Literature: REAL, 13 (1997): 401-418.
  4. Bergo, Bettina. Levinas between Ethics and Politics: For the Beauty that Adorns the Earth. Basel: Springer, 1999.
  5. Bernet, Rudolf. “The Traumatized Subject.” Research in Phenomenology 30 (2000): 160-179.
  6. Bernet, Rudolf. “Travmirovannyĭ subʺekt.” V (Post)fenomenologiia. Novaia fenomenologiia vo Frantsii i za ee predelami [“The Traumatized Subject.” In (Post)Phenomenology. New Phenomenology in France and Beyond], sost. S.S. Sholokhova i A.V. Iampolskaia. Moskva, Akademicheskiĭ proekt, 2014.
  7. Calin, Rodolphe. Levinas et l’exception du soi. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2015.
  8. Chalier, Catherine. La trace de l’infini: Emmanuel Levinas et la source hébraïque. Paris: Cerf, 2002.
  9. Cohen, Richar. Ethics, exegesis, and philosophy: Interpretation after Levinas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  10. Cohen, Richard. Out of control: Confrontations between Spinoza and Levinas. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press, 2016.
  11. Fink, Eugen. Nähe und Distanz. Studien zur Phänomenologie. Freiburg: Karl Alber, 2004.
  12. Fink, Oĭgen. “Operativnyie ponĭatiĭa fenomenologii Gusserlĭa.” V Ezhegodnik po fenomenologicheskoĭ filosofii, [“Operational Terms of Husserl’s Phenomenology.” In Yearbook of Phenomenological Philosophy] 1 (2008): 361-380.
  13. Franck, Didier. L’un-pour-l’autre: Levinas et la signification. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2008.
  14. Frangeskou, Adonis. Levinas, Kant and the Problematic of Temporality. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
  15. Fuchs, Thomas. “Fragmented selves: Temporality and identity in borderline personality disorder.” Psychopathology 40 (2007): 379–87.
  16. Gibbs, Robert. Correlations in Rosenzweig and Levinas. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1992.
  17. Habib, Stéphane. Levinas et Rosenzweig: Philosophies de la Révélation. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2005.
  18. Handelman, Susan. Fragments of redemption: Jewish thought and literary theory in Benjamin, Scholem, and Levinas. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.
  19. Hart, James. Who one is. Bk. 1. Meontology of the ‘I’: a transcendental phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009.
  20. Katz, Claire. Levinas and the crisis of humanism. Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 2012.
  21. Lévinas, Emmanuel. À l’heure des nations. Paris: Minuit, 1988.
  22. ———. Autrement qu’être ou au-délà de l’essence. Paris: Kluwer, 2004.
  23. ———. De Dieu qui vient à l’idée. Paris: Vrin, 1982.
  24. ———. Dieu, la Mort, et le Temps. Paris: Grasset, 1993.
  25. ———. En découvrant l’existence avec Husserl et Heidegger. Paris: Vrin. 1967.
  26. ———. L’au-delà du verset. Lectures et discours talmudiques. Paris: Minuit, 1982.
  27. ———. Liberté et commandement. Paris: Fata Morgana, 1994.
  28. ———. Quatre Lectures Talmudiques. Paris: Minuit, 1968.
  29. ———. Totalité et Infini. Essai sur l’extériorité. Paris: Kluwer Academic, 1994.
  30. Llewelyn, John. Emmanuel Levinas: The Genealogy of Ethics. London: Routledge, 1995.
  31. Maldiney, Henry. Penser l’homme et la folie. Grenoble: Jérôme Million, 1991.
  32. Marion, Jean-Luc. In the self’s place: The approach of Saint Augustine, translated by Jeffrey L. Kosky. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2012.
  33. ———. “La substitution et la solicitude.” In Emmanuel Levinas et les territoires de la pensée, edited by Danielle Cohen-Levinas, Bruno Clément, 51-72. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2007.
  34. Murakami, Yasuhiko. Lévinas phénoménologue. Grenoble: J. Million, 2002.
  35. Peperzak, Adriaan. Beyond: The philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1997.
  36. Putnam, Hilary. Jewish philosophy as a guide of life: Rosenzweig, Buber, Levinas Wittgenstein. Bloomington and Indianopolis, Indiana University Press, 2002.
  37. Richir, Marc. “Phenomenon and Infinity.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 20/21, n.2/1 (1988): 153-188.
  38. Robbins, Jill. “Tracing Responsibility in Levinas’ Ethical Thought.” In Ethics as First Philosophy: The Significance of Emmanuel Levinas for Philosophy, Literature, and Religion, ed. by Adriaan T. Peperzak. London: Routledge 1995.
  39. Romano, Claude. “L’impasse des théories du moi et la nécessité d’un changement de paradigme.” Revue philosophique de Louvain 115, n.2 (2017): 183-212.
  40. Rozentsveĭg, Frants. Zvezda izbavleniia [The Star of Redemption], otv. red. i sost. I. Dvorkin; per. s nem. iaz. E. Ianduganovoĭ. Moskva.: Mosty kul’tury/Gesharim, 2017.
  41. Tengelyi, László. “Selfhood, Passivity and Affectivity in Henry and Lévinas.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17, n. 3 (2009): 401–414.
  42. Waldenfels, Bernard. “Response and Responsibility in Levinas.” In Ethics as First Philosophy: The Significance of Emmanuel Levinas for Philosophy, Literature, and Religion, edited by Adriaan T. Peperzak. London: Routledge, 1995.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-16

How to Cite

Yampolskaya, Anna. 2021. “Prophetic Subjectivity in Later Levinas”. Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology 19 (2):50-69. https://doi.org/10.29357/2789-1577.2021.19.2.50-69.

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 2 (2021): THEOLOGICAL REFLECTIONS: Eastern European Journal of Theology

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Анна Ямпольская

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

All articles published in the Journal are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

By submitting an article for publication in Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology the author grants the editors the right to publish the article and distribute it in electronic and print form.

The author reserves all copyrights and the right to use the materials of the article in whole or in part for educational purposes, to write his own dissertations, to prepare abstracts, conference reports, oral presentations, etc., as well as post electronic copies of articles (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal’s official website) on non-commercial web-resources without the consent of the editorial board and founders.