The Tradition of the Gospel Christians: A Reconstruction of the Practice of Biblical Interpretation

Authors

  • Andrey PUZYNIN He recently joined the Department of Theology and Religion, University of Birmingham, UK as William Paton Fellow and is currently working on a new research project., Austria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2879-6720

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29357/issn.2521-179X.2012.13.7

Keywords:

Evangelical Christians, Baptists, The tradition of evangelical Christians, The Tradition of the Church, The paradigm of the interpretation of Scripture, Practice of biblical interpretation

Abstract

This thesis explores the practice of biblical interpretation in the post-Soviet tradition of the Gospel Christians that has its origins in the ministry of the Victorian revivalist preacher Lord Radstock in St. Petersburg in the 1870s. Attempting to resolve the current interpretive impasse, this study provides a diachronic descriptive analysis of the practice. The analysis reveals that the major causes of the contemporary crisis pertain to the radical shift that took place in the tradition's prac1tice after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The inductive Bible study method was introduced by Western educators and presented as the only correct methodology, thereby rendering the former pre1critical interpretive practices as unscientific and wrong. Building on the discoveries of historical analysis, the thesis suggests a new paradigm for biblical interpretation which is tradition1 continuous. Following the trajectory of the Evangelical tradition in the Post1Soviet context, a trajectory which relies on Western thought, the thesis adopts a theological differential integral hermeneutics. This interpretive strategy takes into account three levels of interpretation: the author's intention, the literal meaning, and the representational content of a text in the history of its interpretation. The interpreter is expected to publicly justify his or her interpretive decisions in light of the community's historical self1identity, its core values, and its concept of good.

Author Biography

Andrey PUZYNIN, He recently joined the Department of Theology and Religion, University of Birmingham, UK as William Paton Fellow and is currently working on a new research project.

Andrey Puzynin (PhD, LicDD, University of Wales Trinity St. David). Director of Lugansk Regional Bible College of Evangelical Christians(Baptists. He authored the book “The Tradition of the Gospel Christians: A Study of their Identity and Theology during the Russian, Soviet and Post(Soviet Periods” (Pickwick Publications [imprint of Wipf and Stock], 2011). Upon completing his course at Denver Seminary (MA with honours in Biblical Studies, 1995–1997) he worked at Donetsk Christian University (1997–2001), tutored and lectured at the MA programme of Nyack College/Alliance Theological Seminary in Kiev, Ukraine (2001–2003 and 2006–2011). He recently joined the Department of Theology and Religion, University of Birmingham, UK as William Paton Fellow and is currently working on a new research project. He is married to Oksana and they have three sons.

References

  1. Ванхузер Кевин Дж. Искусство понимания текста: литературоведческая этика и толкование Писания. – Черкассы: Коллоквиум, 2007.
  2. Пузынин Андрей. Традиция евангельских христиан: изучение самоидентификации и богословия от момента ее зарождения до наших дней. – М.: ББИ Св. ап. Андрея, 2010.
  3. Рикер Поль. Конфликт интерпретаций: очерки о герменевтике. – М.: Канон-пресс-ц, 2002.
  4. Тисельтон Энтони. Герменевтика. – Черкассы: Коллоквиум, 2011.
  5. Ткачук В. Д. Методы и принципы толкования Священного Писания. – Луцк: Центр христианской жизни Украины, 2000.
  6. Хейз Ричард. Возрождение воображения. – Черкассы: Коллоквиум, 2012.
  7. Эко Умберто. Роль читателя: исследования по семиотике текста. – СПб.: Симпозиум, 2007.
  8. Яроцкий П. Л. Клерикальный антисоветизм: система идеологических диверсий. – Киев: Издательство политической литературы Украины, 1984.
  9. Adam, A. K. M. Faithful Interpretation: Reading the Bible in a Postmodern World. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2006.
  10. ______. What Is Postmodern Biblical Interpretation? Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1995.
  11. Archer, Kenneth J. A Pentecostal Hermeneutics for the Twenty-First Century: Spirit, Scripture and Community. London and New York: T&T Clark International, 2004.
  12. Bauckham, Richard. Scripture and Authority Today. Cambridge: Grove Books, 1999.
  13. Bauer, David and Robert Traina, Inductive Bible Study: A Comprehensive Guide to the Practice of Hermeneutics. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2011.
  14. Brueggemann, Walter. The Book That Breathes New Life: Scriptural Authority and Biblical Theology. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2005.
  15. Callahan, James Patrick. Primitivist Piety. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow, 1996.
  16. Dockery, David S. Biblical Interpretation Then and Now: Contemporary Hermeneutics in the Light of the Early Church. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1992.
  17. Eco, Umberto. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. London: Hutchinson Press, 1981.
  18. Fish, Stanley. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.
  19. Ford, David. The Future of Christian Theology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
  20. Fowl, Stephen E., and L. Gregory Jones. Reading in Communion: Scripture and Ethics in Christian Life. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 1998.
  21. Froenlich, Karlfried. Biblical Interpretation in the Early Church. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984.
  22. Grenz, Stanley Renewing the Center. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2000.
  23. Kelsey, David H. Eccentric Existence: A Theological Anthropology, 2 vols. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2009.
  24. Kuznetsova, Miriam R. “Early Russian Evangelicals (1874–1829): Historical Background and Hermeneutical Tendencies Based on I. V. Kargel’s Written Heritage.” Ph.D. diss., University of Pretoria, 2009.
  25. Lindbeck, George A. “Postcritical Canonical Interpretation: Three Modes of Retrieval,” in Theological Exegesis: Essays in Honor of Brevard S. Childs, pp. 28-51. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999.
  26. MacIntyre, Alasdair. “Epistemological Crises, Dramatic Narrative, and the Philosophy of Science.” In Paradigms and Revolutions, pp. 54-74. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1980.
  27. Need, Stephen W. Human Language and Knowledge in the Light of Chalcedon. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 1996.
  28. Nichols, Gregory L. “Ivan V. Kargel (1849-1937) and the Development of Russian Evangelical Spirituality.” Ph.D. diss., University of Wales and International Baptist Theological Seminary, 2009.
  29. Paddison, Angus. Theological Hermeneutics and 1 Thessalonians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  30. Patte, Daniel. Ethics of Biblical Interpretation: A Reevaluation. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1995.
  31. Patterson, Sue. Realist Christian Theology in a Postmodern Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  32. Popov, Alexander. “The Evangelical Christians-Baptists in the Soviet Union as a Hermeneutical Community: Examining the Identity of the All-Union Council of the ECB (AUCECB) through the Way the Bible Was Used in Its Publications.” Ph.D. diss., University of Wales and International Baptist Theological Seminary, 2010.
  33. Puzynin, Andrey P. The Tradition of the Gospel Christians: A Study of Their Identity and Theology during the Russian, Soviet, and Post-Soviet Periods. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2011.
  34. Ricoeur, Paul. The Symbolism of Evil. Boston: Beacon Press, 1967.
  35. Said, Edward W. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage, 1994.
  36. Seitz, Christopher R. Figured Out: Typology and Providence in Christian Scripture. Louisville, KY, and London: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.
  37. Thiselton, Anthony. New Horizons in Hermeneutics. San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1992.
  38. Turlac, Oleg. “The Crisis in Evangelical-Baptist Theological Education.” In East-West Church and Ministry Report 15:1 (2007), 19.
  39. Vandevelde, Pol. The Task of the Interpreter: Text, Meaning, and Negotiation. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2005.
  40. Vanhoozer, Kevin J. The Drama of Doctrine. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2005.
  41. ______. First Theology. Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2002.
  42. ______. “Four Theological Faces of Biblical Interpretation.” In Reading Scripture with the Church: Toward a Hermeneutic for Theological Interpretation, pp. 131–142. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2006.
  43. ______. Is There a Meaning in This Text? Leicester, UK: Apollos, 1998.
  44. ______. Remythologizing Theology: Divine Action, Passion, and Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  45. Virkler, Henry A. Hermeneutics: Principles and Processes of Biblical Interpretation. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1981.
  46. Watson, Francis. Paul and the Hermeneutics of Faith. London and New York: T & T Clark International, 2004.
  47. ______. Text and Truth: Redefining Biblical Theology. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1997.
Theological Reflections: Euro-Asian Journal of Theology

Downloads

How to Cite

PUZYNIN, Andrey. 2012. “The Tradition of the Gospel Christians: A Reconstruction of the Practice of Biblical Interpretation”. Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology, no. 13 (May):32-52. https://doi.org/10.29357/issn.2521-179X.2012.13.7.

Issue

No. 13 (2012): Theological Reflections: Euro-Asian Journal of Theology

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Andrey PUZYNIN

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

All articles published in the Journal are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

By submitting an article for publication in Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology the author grants the editors the right to publish the article and distribute it in electronic and print form.

The author reserves all copyrights and the right to use the materials of the article in whole or in part for educational purposes, to write his own dissertations, to prepare abstracts, conference reports, oral presentations, etc., as well as post electronic copies of articles (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal’s official website) on non-commercial web-resources without the consent of the editorial board and founders.